<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Today&#039;s Green Construction &#187; Electrical</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.todaysgreenconstruction.com/category/electrical/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.todaysgreenconstruction.com</link>
	<description>Constructing Today&#039;s Buildings with the Environment In Mind</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:22:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are CFL&#8217;s Really Cheaper?</title>
		<link>http://www.todaysgreenconstruction.com/2008/08/are-cfls-really-cheaper.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.todaysgreenconstruction.com/2008/08/are-cfls-really-cheaper.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electrical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Products]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/test/2008/08/are-cfls-really-cheaper.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyone is talking about using compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs to reduce our electricity needs. However, I often hear people say they are too expensive for what energy they save. So I decided to do the math to find out for myself whether my recent investment in CFL&#8217;s was worth while financially. I had a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQbaTzjzsw/SKh9C6rfWiI/AAAAAAAACbU/6_DV0409-FU/s1600-h/CFL+Bulb.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_XEQbaTzjzsw/SKh9C6rfWiI/AAAAAAAACbU/6_DV0409-FU/s320/CFL+Bulb.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5235572055883078178" border="0" /></a>Everyone is talking about using compact fluorescent light (CFL) bulbs to reduce our electricity needs. However, I often hear people say they are too expensive for what energy they save. So I decided to do the math to find out for myself whether my recent investment in <a href="http://www.homeconstructionimprovement.com/2008/04/compact-fluorescent-light-bulbs.html">CFL&#8217;s</a> was worth while financially.<span id="fullpost"></p>
<p>I had a feeling they were a good deal but the results of my investigation actually surprised me. There are many ways to compare the costs but I decided to compare one CFL to one incandescent light bulb. I recently purchased 13 watt CFL&#8217;s (GE) to replace several 60 watt incandescent bulbs. A 13 watt CFL hass approximately 825 lumens while the 60 watt incandescent bulb has 860 lumens (basically they are the same level of light). So this example will compare these two bulbs.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Here are the facts:</span> Currently we are paying $0.153 per kWh. I purchased the Philips Soft White 60 watt bulbs for $0.88 each. The GE 13 watt CFL&#8217;s were on sale for $1.49 each (6 pack for $8.95 at Walmart!!). The CFL is rated for 8000 hours of operation and the incandescents are rated for 1000 hours.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Here&#8217;s the Math: </span><br />Incandescent Bulbs: 8 bulbs x $0.88 + 8000 hrs x $0.153 / 1000 x 60 watts = <span style="font-weight: bold;">$80.48</span><br />CFL Bulbs: 1 bulb x $1.49 + 8000 hrs x $0.153 / 1000 x 13 watts = <span style="font-weight: bold;">$17.40</span></p>
<p>So for 8000 hours of light for a single bulb the CFL is almost 5 times cheaper than an incandescent bulb!! If the average home has 40 light bulbs, and the bulbs last about 7 years, then the total savings of $2523 over 7 years or $360 per year. I don&#8217;t know about you but that is a signficant savings plus you&#8217;re helping reduce pollution by reducing your electricity needs.</p>
<p>You can buy the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000NISDNU/homeconstimpr-20">GE 13-Watt Energy SmartTM &#8211; 8 Pack &#8211; 60 watt ouput</a> from Amazon and start replacing your bulbs today.</p>
<div class="tag_list">Tags: <span class="tags"><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Green+Construction" rel="tag">Green Construction</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/Green+Construction+Blog" rel="tag">Green Construction Blog</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/CFL" rel="tag">CFL</a></span></div>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.todaysgreenconstruction.com/2008/08/are-cfls-really-cheaper.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Battle Green &#8211; Fan Vs Air Conditioner</title>
		<link>http://www.todaysgreenconstruction.com/2008/07/battle-green-fan-vs-air-conditioner.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.todaysgreenconstruction.com/2008/07/battle-green-fan-vs-air-conditioner.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electrical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Construction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HVAC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/test/2008/07/battle-green-fan-vs-air-conditioner.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever wondered how ceiling fans compare to air conditioners when it comes to the Green Game? You probably won&#8217;t be shocked by the results but it&#8217;s interesting to look closely at a comparison of issues. The best way to compare two items for their &#8220;greeness&#8221; is to look at several factors: Environmental Impact, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://bp1.blogger.com/_XEQbaTzjzsw/SHVgTbg9GaI/AAAAAAAACDI/hnFoYyU5Evo/s1600-h/Green_ceiling_fan.jpg"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://bp1.blogger.com/_XEQbaTzjzsw/SHVgTbg9GaI/AAAAAAAACDI/hnFoYyU5Evo/s400/Green_ceiling_fan.jpg" alt="picture of green ceiling fan" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5221185229925718434" title="Green Ceiling Fans" border="0" /></a>Have you ever wondered how ceiling fans compare to air conditioners when it comes to the Green Game? You probably won&#8217;t be shocked by the results but it&#8217;s interesting to look closely at a comparison of issues.<span id="fullpost"></p>
<p>The best way to compare two items for their &#8220;greeness&#8221; is to look at several factors: Environmental Impact, Operating Cost, Energy Use, Manufacturing and Cooling Effectiveness.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Environmental Impact</span> &#8211; It&#8217;s not hard to say that the fan wins this category. Air conditioners use refrigerants called fluorocarbons. Even though the newer generation of refrigerants (Puron) are better for the atmosphere the creation of these products are much more energy demanding than any components of a fan. Just manufacturing an air conditioner creates significant environmental pollution compared to the fan.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Operating Cost</span> &#8211; Fans win this category also. Running a fan is significantly cheaper than running an air conditioner. Air conditioners also require yearly maintenance which adds to the operating costs.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Energy Use</span> &#8211; It is estimated that a typical ceiling fan uses 1/30th the energy that a standard window air conditioner uses. Therefore you could have 30 fans throughout your house blowing on your every position for the cost of running one window air conditioner in a room that you probably only occupy for a small portion of the day. Again, the fan wins big in the category. You can also use a <a href="http://www.homeconstructionimprovement.com/2008/08/whole-house-fans-vs-attic-fans.html">whole house fan</a> which cools down the entire house for a fan system that&#8217;s even more efficient.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Manufacturing</span> &#8211; Fans win this category as well. As I pointed out in the environmental impact section the manufacturing process for air conditioners is much more involved than fans. Not only is the unit more demanding but the refrigerants are as well. Fans are very simple machines that use a small motor and a bunch of simple components. Air conditioners have many complicated working parts including a compressor, an evaporator, coils, filters and gas compounds.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Cooling Effectiveness</span> &#8211; Obviously the air conditioner wins this category especially on those really hot, humid days when it&#8217;s even hard to breathe. However, if you eliminate the really bad days the fan still does a very effective job at cooling a person down. One of the most important factors in how we feel cool is the movement of air over our skin. So an air temperature can be warmer but be flowing over our skin and feel just as comfortable as a room chilled down with no air movement.</p>
<p><span style="font-weight: bold;">Conclusion</span> &#8211; Obviously if you&#8217;re talking about which cooling device is greener the fan wins hands down. Strategically placed ceiling fans, exhaust fans and window placements can provide a very comfortable living atmosphere even in warm climates. Choosing fans over air conditioners is certainly the green choice. If you don&#8217;t have ceiling fans in your existing home and you&#8217;d like to install some in place of your existing light fixtures then visit my other blog and read <a href="http://www.homeconstructionimprovement.com/2008/07/how-to-replace-light-fixture-with.html">How To Replace Light Fixture with Ceiling Fan</a>.</p>
<div class="tag_list">Tags: <span class="tags"><a href="http://technorati.com/tag/green+construction" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/green+construction?user=fratzels'">green construction</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/green+construction+blog" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/green+construction+blog?user=fratzels'">green construction blog</a>, <a href="http://technorati.com/tag/fans+vs+air+conditioners" rel="tag" target="_blank" onmouseover="this.href='http://technorati.com/tag/fans+vs+air+conditioners?user=fratzels'">fans vs air conditioners</a></span></div>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.todaysgreenconstruction.com/2008/07/battle-green-fan-vs-air-conditioner.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
